Our revolutionary visual approach to teaching math is proven to help all students in grades PreK–8 master foundational math concepts and close equity gaps. Our unique approach is based on gold-star neuroscience research and numerous efficacy studies across the country, with results that show the impact equity of our unconventional approach for all students' subgroups.
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
San Diego | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Clay Springs Elementary | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Gifted | View Study
English Language Learners | View Study
Economically Disadvantaged | View Study
Special Education | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Philadelphia | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Statewide percentile rank is determined for each grade-level by first assigning each grade’s performance a z-score based on the statewide math achievement distribution (Scale Score or Percent Met Standards) for all grades in that state, and then evaluating the percentile rank equivalent to that z-score.
The more students use ST Math, the more they learn, and the faster they grow. Schools that demonstrated consistent use of ST Math outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by 14 percentage points.
Use ST Math for 60 minutes a week to start seeing growth
Engagement means more usage and robust results. Excite every student about their journey to math proficiency and accomplishment with ST Math.
Data Spotlights, Implementation Highlights and Educator Perspectives
Multiple Districts: 2011 v. 2012 | Download PDF |
Multiple Districts: 2010 to 2013* | Download PDF |
Fremont: 2011 v. 2012+ | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2010 v. 2011** | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2009 to 2012** | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2011 v. 2012 | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2011 to 2013+ | Download PDF |
Napa Valley: 2010 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2008 to 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2009 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2010 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2011 v. 2012* | Download PDF |
Silicon Valley: 2009 to 2011** | Download PDF |
Silicon Valley: 2009 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Silicon Valley: 2010 v. 2011** | Download PDF |
Colorado Springs SD 11: 2011 v. 2012* | Download PDF |
Colorado Springs: 2011 to 2013+ | Download PDF |
Multiple Counties: 2011 v. 2012* | Download PDF |
Orange County Public Schools: 2010 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Pinellas County Schools: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
Full-state: 2013-2014 (summary) | Download PDF |
Full-state: 2013-2014 (full report) | Download PDF |
Chicago: 2010 v. 2011+ | Download PDF |
Chicago: 2011 to 2012* | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013-2014 (summary) | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013-2014 (full report) | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013 v. 2015 (summary)** | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013 v. 2015 (full report)** | Download PDF |
Minneapolis: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
Full State: 2012-2014 (summary) | Download PDF |
Full State: 2012-2014 (full report) | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2009 to 2011 (7 schools)+ | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2009 v. 2011 | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2010 v. 2011 (6 schools)+ | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2011 to 2013 | Download PDF |
New York City: 2010 v. 2011 | Download PDF |
New York City: 2010 to 2012 | Download PDF |
Cypress-Fairbanks ISD: 2010 v. 2011+ | Download PDF |
Dallas ISD: 2010 v. 2011** | Download PDF |
Houston: 2010 v. 2011 | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2013 to 2015 (summary)* | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2013 v 2015 (full report)* | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2014 v. 2015 (summary)** | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2014 v 2015 (full report)** | Download PDF |
Multiple Districts: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
Multiple Districts: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
D.C. Public Schools: 2012 v. 2013** | Download PDF |
D.C. Public Schools: 2012 v. 2014** | Download PDF |
D.C. Public Schools: 2012 v. 2014 (full report) | Download PDF |