At MIND, we don’t just believe in equity – we deliver it. Our patented, evidence-based approach is not just another program to teach math; it’s a game-changer, focusing on how to LEARN math rather than how to TEACH it. ST Math ensures that every student, regardless of background or ability, experiences math in a way that aligns with how every single brain is naturally designed to learn.
From the gifted and talented to special education students, from emerging bilinguals to native English speakers – ST Math makes math success an achievable reality for every student.
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
San Diego | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Clay Springs Elementary | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Gifted | View Study
English Language Learners | View Study
Economically Disadvantaged | View Study
Special Education | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Philadelphia | View Study
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ST Math schools outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by percentile points.
ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
No ST Math Implementation |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Statewide percentile rank is determined for each grade-level by first assigning each grade’s performance a z-score based on the statewide math achievement distribution (Scale Score or Percent Met Standards) for all grades in that state, and then evaluating the percentile rank equivalent to that z-score.
Our rigorous and ongoing research is unparalleled with over 100 studies and evaluations at school, district, and state levels, holding ourselves accountable for delivering consistent, repeatable results year after year. Our approach and results are validated by third-party assessments to ensure effectiveness across various settings and demographics. The impact of ST Math is a reliable program with robust results, for every school and student.
2016/2017 Math Outcomes Analysis »
2017/2018 Math Outcomes Analysis »
2018/2019 Math Outcomes Analysis »
2021/2022 Math Outcomes Analysis »
Our commitment to equitable impact is proven by numerous studies conducted year over year in schools across the country. No matter the state, assessment type, or school setting, ST Math consistently and robustly boosts math scores.
Will Miller has been a distance learning developer at MIND for the past 4 years and has 11 years experience in education. While earning his MS in Education he worked as a curriculum designer and adult instructor of ESL.
After graduating, Will served for 3 years as an Instructional Designer building online learning, in-person training, and certificate program materials for educational technology companies.
For the past 6 years, he has been a distance learning web developer building HTML5 course and manual frameworks, various web applications, and a central learning hub for adult learners.
Will Miller has been a distance learning developer at MIND for the past 4 years and has 11 years experience in education. While earning his MS in Education he worked as a curriculum designer and adult instructor of ESL.
After graduating, Will served for 3 years as an Instructional Designer building online learning, in-person training, and certificate program materials for educational technology companies.
For the past 6 years, he has been a distance learning web developer building HTML5 course and manual frameworks, various web applications, and a central learning hub for adult learners.
Will Miller has been a distance learning developer at MIND for the past 4 years and has 11 years experience in education. While earning his MS in Education he worked as a curriculum designer and adult instructor of ESL.
After graduating, Will served for 3 years as an Instructional Designer building online learning, in-person training, and certificate program materials for educational technology companies.
For the past 6 years, he has been a distance learning web developer building HTML5 course and manual frameworks, various web applications, and a central learning hub for adult learners.
Will Miller has been a distance learning developer at MIND for the past 4 years and has 11 years experience in education. While earning his MS in Education he worked as a curriculum designer and adult instructor of ESL.
After graduating, Will served for 3 years as an Instructional Designer building online learning, in-person training, and certificate program materials for educational technology companies.
For the past 6 years, he has been a distance learning web developer building HTML5 course and manual frameworks, various web applications, and a central learning hub for adult learners.
The more students use ST Math, the more they learn, and the faster they grow. Schools that demonstrated consistent use of ST Math outgrew similar schools in statewide rank by 14 percentage points.
Use ST Math for 60 minutes a week to start seeing growth
I’m encouraged to see that ST Math continues to show significant effects on math achievement. But I’m even more impressed with the breadth of ST Math evaluations towards evaluating every school, every year, which provides a model for other educational technology companies to follow.
Data Spotlights, Implementation Highlights and Educator Perspectives
Multiple Districts: 2011 v. 2012 | Download PDF |
Multiple Districts: 2010 to 2013* | Download PDF |
Fremont: 2011 v. 2012+ | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2010 v. 2011** | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2009 to 2012** | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2011 v. 2012 | Download PDF |
Los Angeles: 2011 to 2013+ | Download PDF |
Napa Valley: 2010 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2008 to 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2009 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2010 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Orange County: 2011 v. 2012* | Download PDF |
Silicon Valley: 2009 to 2011** | Download PDF |
Silicon Valley: 2009 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Silicon Valley: 2010 v. 2011** | Download PDF |
Colorado Springs SD 11: 2011 v. 2012* | Download PDF |
Colorado Springs: 2011 to 2013+ | Download PDF |
Multiple Counties: 2011 v. 2012* | Download PDF |
Orange County Public Schools: 2010 v. 2011* | Download PDF |
Pinellas County Schools: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
Full-state: 2013-2014 (summary) | Download PDF |
Full-state: 2013-2014 (full report) | Download PDF |
Chicago: 2010 v. 2011+ | Download PDF |
Chicago: 2011 to 2012* | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013-2014 (summary) | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013-2014 (full report) | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013 v. 2015 (summary)** | Download PDF |
Full State: 2013 v. 2015 (full report)** | Download PDF |
Minneapolis: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
Full State: 2012-2014 (summary) | Download PDF |
Full State: 2012-2014 (full report) | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2009 to 2011 (7 schools)+ | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2009 v. 2011 | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2010 v. 2011 (6 schools)+ | Download PDF |
Clark County: 2011 to 2013 | Download PDF |
New York City: 2010 v. 2011 | Download PDF |
New York City: 2010 to 2012 | Download PDF |
Cypress-Fairbanks ISD: 2010 v. 2011+ | Download PDF |
Dallas ISD: 2010 v. 2011** | Download PDF |
Houston: 2010 v. 2011 | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2013 to 2015 (summary)* | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2013 v 2015 (full report)* | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2014 v. 2015 (summary)** | Download PDF |
Killeen: 2014 v 2015 (full report)** | Download PDF |
Multiple Districts: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
Multiple Districts: 2012 v. 2013 | Download PDF |
D.C. Public Schools: 2012 v. 2013** | Download PDF |
D.C. Public Schools: 2012 v. 2014** | Download PDF |
D.C. Public Schools: 2012 v. 2014 (full report) | Download PDF |